Legal Opinion

Kalamazoo Auto Sales Co. v. Travelers Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1924No. Docket No. 47PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

(after stating the facts). Defendant is not relieved from liability because the accident happened on one of the inland lakes of the State. Defendant does not write marine insurance, but it does insure against liability for accidents, and the fact that the accident occurred on an inland lake instead of on a public highway does not of itself preclude recovery if the accident is otherwise within the coverage of the policy.

The policy does not itself limit liability to those accidents which occur at the location of the garage fixed at a definite place in items 3 and 6, and we should not so limit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frint Motor Car Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Sprague v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Frint Motor Car Co. v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pawlicki v. HollenbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Home Mutual Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Sutton v. Hawkeye Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API