Sutton v. Hawkeye Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McAllister, circuit judge.
The Hawkeye Casualty Company issued an automobile insurance policy, to run for a period of one year, to Jack White, in Kalamazoo, Michigan, on May 8, 1941. One of the provisions of the policy, under the heading of “Warranties,” is as fol lows: “The automobile will be principally garaged and used in the above town, township, county and state (Kalamazoo, Michigan) unless otherwise specified herein — No exceptions.” In a subsequent portion, it is provided: (1) that the policy issued “ * * * in consideration of the payment of the premiums and of the statements contained…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moulor v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Continental Life Insurance v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Pawlicki v. HollenbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Cohen v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Elliott v. Casualty Ass'n of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Farm Bureau Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Hoosier Cas. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind. v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- McCann for Use of Osterman v. Continental Cas. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1955
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.