Legal Opinion

Downs v. Linton's Lunch

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1938No. Appeal, 247PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

This is another workmen’s compensation case with a long and involved history covering a period of eight years. The gravamen of the appellant-claimant’s appeal is that, by reason of an erroneous decision by a referee in 1932 followed by a series of technical maneuvers upon the part of her employer and its insurance carrier, she has been deprived of her right, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, and its amendments, to a hearing upon the merits of her claim for additional compensation alleged to be due her by reason of the recurrence of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conley v. Allegheny CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Calabria v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Roeschen v. DietrichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Busi v. A. & S. Wilson Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Plum v. Hotel WashingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Downs v. Linton's LunchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Downs v. Linton's LunchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API