Legal Opinion
Stevens v. Carlin
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided February 7, 2018No. Case No. 3:14–cv–00403–REBPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Table of Contents
Background...1099
Habeas Corpus Standard of Law...1105
Discussion...1109
1. Clearly-Established Law...1109
2. In Denying Claim 1, the Idaho Court of Appeals Unreasonably Applied Brady v. Maryland, Kyles v. Whitley , and Bagley v. United States ...1110
A. Assuming Post-Release and Post-Embalming Removal of the Eyes, the State Court's Conclusion that the Evidence Was Not in the Government's Possession or Control Was Unreasonable...1110
B. Assuming Post-Release and Post-Embalming Removal of the Eyes, the State Court's Implied Conclusion that the Evidence Was Not Impeaching Was…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.