Legal Opinion

Copeland v. Carpenter

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1947No. 16004PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The sufficiency of the petition is challenged by the demurrer on the ground that it states no cause of action for any of the relief prayed. “The owner of any estate in lands may maintain an action for libelous or slanderous words falsely and maliciously impugning his title, if any damage shall have accrued to him therefrom.” Code, § 105-1411. A petition which alleges the uttering and publishing of slanderous words, that they were false, that they were malicious, that special damage resulted, and that the plaintiff had an estate in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City Council of Augusta v. MarksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Schoen v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Latson v. BoazSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Sanders v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Daniels v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Hammond v. City of Warner RobinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. M.C. Anderson v. GoldenDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API