Legal Opinion

State v. Dye

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The record does not show any exception by the defendant when the F.B.I. record was offered and received in evidence. The assignment of error with reference to the reception of this report in evidence is, therefore, ineffectual. State v. Mallory, 266 N.C. 31, 145 S.E. 2d 335; State v. Maness, 264 N.C. 358, 141 S.E. 2d 470. In any event, it was not error for the court, following the defendant’s plea of guilty, to receive this record in evidence in open court and consider it in determining the sentence to be imposed. See State v. Pope, 257 N.C. 326, 126 S.E. 2d 126. There is no suggestion that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. State v. MallorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. ManessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Knowles v. Carolina Coach Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API