Legal Opinion

State v. Chaney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1984No. 83-1135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ.P. Celebrezze, J.

The sole issue presented in this case is the propriety of the jury instruction on the value of the items stolen.

The question is important as R.C. 2913.02 distinguishes theft offenses according, inter alia, to the value of the property stolen. Prior to its amendment on January 1, 1983,1 the statute provided that where the value of the *210item was less than one hundred fifty dollars, the offense was petty theft, a first degree misdemeanor.2 Where the value was one hundred fifty dollars or more, the offense was grand theft, a felony of the fourth degree.3

The guidelines for determining value are set…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Raymond Ralph Roberts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  2. Barney v. MaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Child v. OrtonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  4. In Re Estate of StengelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Brandon v. YeakleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DanielsOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. Sines-RileyOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. State v. SherfeyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. Call, 2007-Ap-06-0036 (3-28-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API