Legal Opinion

In Re Johnson

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona

Decided October 5, 1995No. Bankruptcy B-95-2029-PHX-CGCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS

CHARLES G. CASE, II, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION.

Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by creditor Robert C. Russoli (“Russo-li”). Russoli claims that the Debtors, Snellen M. Johnson and Suzanne Johnson (“Debtors”), do not meet the eligibility standards to file Chapter 13, as set forth in Section 109(e), because their unsecured debts exceed the statutory maximum of $250,000. 1 Russoli argues that at least two unsecured claims, his own and that of Fritz Richard and Edwin J. MacDonald (“MacDonald”), each, independently, put Debtors over the $250,000…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Robert John Love, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. In Re Albert H. Caldwell, Debtor. James E. Hardin, James C. Hardin, and Ralph Majors, Cross-Appellants v. Albert H. Caldwell, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Warren (In Re Warren)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Sylvester v. Dow Jones & Co. (In Re Sylvester)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Nelson v. Easley (In Re Easley)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re PetersenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API