Legal Opinion

Huynh v. Jabil Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 7, 2023No. 3:22-cv-07460Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STRONG HUYNH, Case No. 22-cv-07460-WHO Plaintiff, 8 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STRIKE 10 JABIL INC., Re: Dkt. No. 24 Defendant. 11 12 13 Defendant Jabil, Inc. moves to dismiss plaintiff Strong Huynh’s wage-and-hour causes of 14 action and Huynh’s derivative unlawful business practices cause of action for failure to state 15 plausible claims to relief. Jabil also moves to strike Huynh’s class allegations. As explained 16 below, most of Huynh’s claims are plausibly…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API