Legal Opinion

In Re Quintero

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 8, 2000No. 19-40332PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND DECISION

RICHARD L. SPEER, Chief Judge.

This cause comes before the Court upon the Trustee’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Trustee’s Objection to Exemptions. The Trustee has submitted a Memorandum in Support of his Motion. In opposition thereto, the Debtors have filed a Motion To Disallow the Trustee’s Objection. The Court, upon reviewing the arguments stated in the Motions, and the Memorandum and attached exhibit of the Trustee, finds that the Trustee’s Motion for Summary Judgment should be Granted.

FACTS

The Debtors, Eduardo and Annette Quintero (hereinafter referred…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. In Re HowertonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1982
  4. In Re FichterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
  5. Kirkland v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re AndrewsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
  2. In Re MonroUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API