Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Rosenshine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1904PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, George Rosenshine and another, doing business under the style or firm name of Rosenshine Brothers, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 14th day of March, 1904, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 17tli day of March, 1904, denying the defendants’ motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.:

The plaintiff, as the assignee of one Nina Kaufman, sued the defendants, copartners, to recover a sum of money which he alleges his assignor left on deposit with them under an agreement that it should be paid back to her on demand with such profits as might have been earned upon that sum of money while it was used in the copartnership business. The allegations of the complaint in this regard were denied by the defendants. It appeared in evidence that Miss Kaufman being about to marry one Max Rosenshine, a brother of the defendants, was presented with the sum of $2,000 as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. . FitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Tate v. Tate'sSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. People v. Fitzgerald, New York County Courts1979
  3. People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Vilardi v. VilardiNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Mileski v. LockerNew York Supreme Court · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API