Mayacamas Corp. v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Benham, Judge.
These two cases arose as a result of breach of contract claims that Mayacamas Corporation and Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation asserted against each other. We have consolidated the cases in the interest of judicial economy. The threshold question to be resolved is whether the Georgia court that tried the cases had personal jurisdiction over the defendant Mayacamas under the Georgia Long Arm Statute (OCGA § 9-10-91). Mayacamas contends that it did not, and we agree.
Mayacamas, a California corporation, contracted to purchase an aircraft, the G-IV, from Gulfstream, a Georgia…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gust v. FlintSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Wise v. State Board for Examination, Qualification & Registration of ArchitectsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Saunders v. PadovaniSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Capital Associates, Inc. v. Gallopade Enterprises International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Aero Toy Store, LLC v. GrievesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Electronic Transaction Network v. KatzDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1989
- White House, Inc. v. WinklerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Scovill Fasteners, Inc. v. Sure-Snap Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Signet Bank/Virginia v. TillisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.