Legal Opinion

Arsenault v. Bhattacharya

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 3, 2016No. AC 15-P-197PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarhart, J.

In this case, we must decide whether dismissal without prejudice was the appropriate remedy for a failure by the plaintiff, Patricia Arsenault, to provide notice to the defendant, Subroto Bhattacharya, of her intention to sue, as required by G. L. c. 231, § 60L. See St. 2012, c. 224, § 221 (“An Act improving the quality of health care and reducing costs through increased transparency, efficiency and innovation”). The statute is silent as to remedies for a failure to comply with its terms, and there are no decisions interpreting it. See Ashley v. New York State Office of Children & Family…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Spring v. Geriatric Authority of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Hashimi v. KalilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. York v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. EMILY LANE v. WINCHESTER HOSPITAL & another.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
  2. DOUBLE B CAPITAL GROUP, LLC v. DAVID ELLIS & another.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
  3. W.R.S. v. R.S.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API