Arsenault v. Bhattacharya
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarhart, J.
In this case, we must decide whether dismissal without prejudice was the appropriate remedy for a failure by the plaintiff, Patricia Arsenault, to provide notice to the defendant, Subroto Bhattacharya, of her intention to sue, as required by G. L. c. 231, § 60L. See St. 2012, c. 224, § 221 (“An Act improving the quality of health care and reducing costs through increased transparency, efficiency and innovation”). The statute is silent as to remedies for a failure to comply with its terms, and there are no decisions interpreting it. See Ashley v. New York State Office of Children & Family…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Spring v. Geriatric Authority of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Hashimi v. KalilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- York v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- EMILY LANE v. WINCHESTER HOSPITAL & another.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
- DOUBLE B CAPITAL GROUP, LLC v. DAVID ELLIS & another.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
- W.R.S. v. R.S.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018