Robles v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDiPENTIMA, C.J.
*752 The petitioner, Rolando Robles, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner argues that the habeas court improperly denied his petition because his guilty pleas, made pursuant to the Alford doctrine, 1 were not made knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily as a result of the new interpretation of our kidnapping statutes as detailed in State v. Salamon , 287 Conn. 509 , 949 A.2d 1092 (2008), and *753 its progeny. We conclude that the petitioner's specific claim regarding the knowing and intelligent nature of his pleas…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pereira v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Britton v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Little v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Smorodska v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Alicea v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.