Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood KS & Mid-MO v. Brownback
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 25, 2014No. 11-3235, 12-3178, 13-3175PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
The federal government subsidizes the cost of family-planning services for low-income individuals through Title X of the Public Health Service Act. It often grants Title X funding directly to a state, which in turn makes subgrants to family-planning service providers. Kansas is one such state.
In May 2011 Kansas Governor Sam Brownback signed into law an appropriations bill restricting the classes of entities eligible for Title X subgrants. It limits the recipients to public entities, hospitals, and federally qualified health centers that provide comprehensive primary and…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Safe Streets Alliance v. HickenlooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- First Western Capital Management Co. v. MalamedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Margheim v. BuljkoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Kane County, Utah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Verlo v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.