Legal Opinion
O'Donnell v. Ameresco, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 9, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00085Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JOSEPH M. O'DONNELL, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00085-AN Plaintiff, v. OPINION AND ORDER AMERESCO, INC., Defendant. Plaintiff Joseph M. O'Donnell filed this action against defendant Ameresco, Inc., alleging state law claims for (1) breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing; (2) wrongful discharge via retaliation; and (3) age discrimination. On February 14, 2023, defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff's first and second claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Oral argument was heard on September 12, 2023. For…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office SolutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.