Legal Opinion

Hall v. Roehr & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1912No. 3590PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Trover; from city court of Bainbridge — W. V. Cugter, judge pro hac vice.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. Under the mandatory provisions of the constitution of this State — article 6, section 16 (Civil Code of 1910, § 6543) — the venue of all civil eases is in the county where the defendant resides,'except in certain cases specified in paragraphs 1 to 5 (inclusive) of the said article. A trover suit is a civil ease, and is not among the exceptions to the general rule. Where, therefore, a timely and sufficient plea to the jurisdiction of the court was filed, on the ground that the defendant was not a resident of the county in which the suit was *380brought, it was error for the trial judge to…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morse v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Clark Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Flemming v. DrakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. Farmer v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Garvin v. Mayor of WaynesboroCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API