Hall v. Roehr & Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Trover; from city court of Bainbridge — W. V. Cugter, judge pro hac vice.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.
1. Under the mandatory provisions of the constitution of this State — article 6, section 16 (Civil Code of 1910, § 6543) — the venue of all civil eases is in the county where the defendant resides,'except in certain cases specified in paragraphs 1 to 5 (inclusive) of the said article. A trover suit is a civil ease, and is not among the exceptions to the general rule. Where, therefore, a timely and sufficient plea to the jurisdiction of the court was filed, on the ground that the defendant was not a resident of the county in which the suit was *380brought, it was error for the trial judge to…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Morse v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Clark Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Flemming v. DrakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Farmer v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Garvin v. Mayor of WaynesboroCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.