Murrin v. Rifugiato
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,
This is an appeal from judgment n.o.v. entered for two defendants after a verdict of a jury for plaintiffs in a trespass action for damages to real property. The single question presented is whether the tortfeasor was the agent of defendant property owners or an independent contractor.
Leroy and Emma Murrin, husband and wife, owners of a house in Wilkinsburg, Pennsylvania, are plaintiffs. The adjoining lot, on which stands a garage but no dwelling house, is owned by Mary Rifugiato, one of the defendants. Plaintiffs alleged and offered evidence to prove…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kopka v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Feller v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Brooks v. Buckley & BanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Flaharty v. TroutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Miller v. MerrittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Green v. Independent Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Cox v. CAETISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Super v. West Penn Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Brookhaven Bap. Ch. v. Wcab (Halvorson)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.