Legal Opinion

Grove v. The Admiral

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 23, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Admiralty. Action by Francis H. Grove and others for damages caused by collision.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

This is an action brought by the owners of the water-boat Croton to recover for the sinking of that boat in a collision with the lighter Admiral that occurred in the East river on the 13th day of February, 1888. The Admiral was proceeding up the East river along the piers. The Croton was crossing the river from the New York shore, bound to the slip at Prentice’s Stores, on the Brooklyn side. An examination of the evidence shows the collision to have been occasioned by the fault of the Croton, and not by the fault of the Admiral. The Croton was on a course crossing the course of the Admiral,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. The HokendaquaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  2. Hygrade No. 12, Inc. v. The TalismanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. The Socony No. 5Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  4. The Georgia v. The LuckenbachDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1891
  5. Southern Pac. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API