Legal Opinion
Hygrade No. 12, Inc. v. The Talisman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 4, 1946No. 130PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The one blast signal which the-Central blew to the Talisman when these vessels were approaching each other green to green was in violation of Article 18, Rule I of the Inland Rules, 33 U.S.C.A. § 203. These vessels were not then meeting head and head, being from one hundred feet to perhaps more than twice that to. the starboard of each other, and the statute called for a two blast signal followed' by a starboard to starboard passing. Construction Aggregates Co. v. Long Island R. Co., 2 Cir., 105 F.2d 1009. That required, no change of course by either. The East, River is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Postal SS Corp. v. El IsleoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Construction Aggregates Co. v. Long Island R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- City of New York v. American Export Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co. v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Libelant-Appellee v. The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- W. E. Hedger Transp. Corp. v. HartCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Erie Lackawanna Railway Co. v. TimpanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- New York Central Railroad v. Texaco Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Erie Lackawanna Railway Co. v. TimpanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.