Judge v. Durham
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Special Judge.
This is an action in equity by respondent for an injunction, to prevent interference with an alleged ea,sement over the driveway of the appellants - and for damages. The trial court found for the respondent and this appeal followed. By an opinion and order of this court in March, 1954, this cause was transferred to the Supreme Court of Missouri because title to real estate was thought to be involved. Judge v. Durham, Mo.App., 2(55 S.W.2d 437. That court, determining otherwise, retransferred the cause here; Judge v. Durham, 274 S.W.2d 247.
Elizabeth Street and South Sixth…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Edie v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Pitzman v. BoyceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Jacobs v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- Anthony v. Kennard Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Sanford v. KernSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Whittom v. Alexander-Richardson PartnershipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Nichols v. PendleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Gover v. ClevelandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Mondelli v. Saline Sewer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- M. H. Siegfried Real Estate, Inc. v. RenfrowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.