Legal Opinion

State v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 20, 2007No. A07A0232PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

Prior to his trial on a DUI charge, Matthew Alan Stewart moved to suppress evidence relating to the breathalyzer test administered to him, based upon his alleged failure to understand the implied consent warnings given by police. The trial court granted that motion, and the State filed this appeal pursuant to OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (4). Finding that the trial court failed to apply the relevant law, we reverse.

In reviewing a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress where, as here, “the evidence was uncontroverted and no question regarding the credibility of witnesses was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Furcal-Peguero v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kurecka v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Seung Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. William Newman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API