Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 24, 2002No. S02A0412PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Presiding Justice.

The appellant, Omar Rodriguez, who speaks Spanish and not English, appeals from his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. He contends, first, that the results of his blood-alcohol tests should have been suppressed because OCGA § 24-9-103, which provides that police officers must attempt to obtain a qualified interpreter to inform a hearing impaired person of his implied consent warnings, violates equal protection since it does not provide that an officer must attempt to obtain an interpreter for people who do not speak English. Rodriguez also contends…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Ambles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  4. Pemberthy v. BeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. OlivoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mason v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  2. Nicely v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  3. Bell v. AustinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  4. Drew v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  5. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API