Legal Opinion
People v. Reddy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 24, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The evidence presented to the hearing court supports its conclusion that the identification procedures conducted by the police were not so suggestive as to warrant suppression of the complainant’s identification testimony at trial. We are unpersuaded by the defendant’s contention that the lineup was tainted merely because a police officer, approximately two months earlier, had told the complainant that it would probably be necessary for him to view a lineup of the persons whose photographs he selected as having been two of the three perpetrators of the robbery (see, People v Rodriguez, 64…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. SantiagoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. RoopchandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. BaldoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. HaynesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. CastriconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. PompeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989