Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Harris

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1998No. 1998-0719Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 3.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HARRIS. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Harris,

1998-Ohio-686.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Conviction of conspiracy to commit an offense or defraud the United States in violation of Section 371, Title 18, U.S.Code. (No. 98-719—Submitted July 8, 1998—Decided November 10, 1998.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 97-53. __________________ {¶ 1} During 1995, respondent, Paula Castle Harris of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API