Legal Opinion

Minton v. . Hughes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1912PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Justice, J., at October Term, 1911, of Heet-fokd. A motion to set aside a judgment upon the ground of excusable neglect under section 513 of the Revisal. His Honor declined to set aside the judgment, and the defendant appealed to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The Court is of opinion in this case that it is unnecessary to consider the question of excusable neglect for which his Honor declined to set aside the judgment in the court below. Not only must the defendant show excusable neglect as defined by many decisions of this Court, but he must also show that he has meritorious defense. Norton v. McLaurin, 125 N. C., 189; Turner v. Machine Co., 133 N. C., 384.

Upon consideration of this feature of the case, we are of the opinion that defendant’s petition and affidavits show no defense to the action which could avail him in law. Pharr v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Turner v. Threshing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Pharr v. . RussellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1851

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cahoon v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Cahoon v. . BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Beaufort Lumber Co. v. CottinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Allen v. . McPhersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Estes v. . RashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API