Legal Opinion
Shaad v. Hutchinson's Boat Works, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Robert Lynch, J.
The plaintiff, an attorney, has brought this action to recover the value of legal services alleged to have been performed for the defendant. The complaint is stated in quantum meruit and seeks $5,214.87 with interest from June 1, 1962, the date of an alleged demand for payment and the date upon which the plaintiff contends that his cause of action accrued. A bare summons was served on May 29, *6321968. The defendant contests the merits of the complaint. It also asserts a defense of the six-year Statute of Limitations (see Shaad v Hutchinson’s Boat Works, 40 AD2d 757).
The plaintiff was first…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- National City Bank of NY v. HotchkissSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Claim of Ahern v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Noce v. KaufmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Hudson v. Yonkers Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Birnholz v. SteiselDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. 849 St. Nicholas EquitiesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988
- Romas v. WelchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990