Almond v. Anderegg
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.
(Pro Tempore).
This is a suit in equity to quiet title to certain real property. Plaintiffs claim is based upon adverse possession. Defendant is the record title holder. Defendant concedes that plaintiff has established a prescriptive use of a portion of the parcel in question denominated as a "roadway” sufficient to gain an easement but denies that plaintiff has established such adverse possession of any of the parcel as to acquire fee title thereto. The trial court found that the plaintiff had gained fee title to the entire parcel and decreed that plaintiff "be and hereby is decreed to be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norgard v. Busher Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Springer v. DURRETTE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Grimstad v. DordanOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Pacific Mill Co. v. InmanOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Grant v. Oregon Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Roche v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Lee v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Allison v. ShepherdOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Whitley v. JacobsOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Larson v. TrachselOregon Supreme Court · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.