In re Gubelman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). It does not seem necessary to us to decide whether the bankrupts remained liable upon the draft after they had posted the advice to the drawee and the drawee had made the necessary entries on its books. Even if they did so remain, they could so finally and completely devote a part of their balance with the drawee to the payment of the draft as to create themselves constructive trustees pro tanto for the benefit of the holder, and disable themselves thereafter from recalling what they had done. Performance once executed was irrevocable, because there was no…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Ingersoll v. CoramSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Hurley v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- In re Interborough Consol. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re GubelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- In re Zimmerman & ForshayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- In Re GubelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Wills v. City of MontereyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024