Legal Opinion

State v. Betancourth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2018No. 94208-1PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

*359 ¶ 1 This case requires us to consider the "independent source doctrine," which is a recognized exception to the exclusionary rule under article I, section 7 of the Washington State Constitution. The superior court admitted into evidence Ray Betancourth's cell phone records, which were initially obtained under a jurisdictionally invalid district court warrant. Though a valid superior court warrant was subsequently issued for the same records, police did not physically return and reseize the evidence. In upholding admission of the cell phone records, the Court of Appeals fashioned what it…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. MayfieldWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  2. v. Dominguez-CastorColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. McElrathTennessee Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State Of Washington v. Artur TysyachukCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington, V. David Gudgell & Robert GudgellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API