McNeely v. Bone
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
This appeal results from an order to sell real estate and divide the proceeds. The appellants contend the land, of which they are part owners, could have been partitioned in kind, and they contend the partition statutes are unconstitutionally applied in this case. We find no merit in either point, and thus we affirm.
1. Constitutionality
The appellants, descendants of John B. Blanton, have inherited various undivided interests in 160 acres of land which Blanton obtained by patent in 1904. The appellees have purchased the undivided interests of twelve other Blanton…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cude v. CudeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Holmes v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bell v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Dalton v. City of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Washington v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
- Crenshaw v. McFallsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Vowell v. Waldrip Lands, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025