Legal Opinion
Summers v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 18, 1982No. Civ. 81-73233PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RALPH M. FREEMAN, District Judge.
This civil action brought by an employee of defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co., and Carolyn Summers, his wife, is based upon an alleged unlawful demotion. Ross Summers asserts two causes of action arising out of his demotion. He claims that his demotion constituted a breach of his employment contract and unlawful age discrimination under the Michigan Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, M.C.L.A. § 37.2101 et seq. Carolyn Summers claims loss of consortium under each of her husband’s causes of action. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Reid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Castiglione v. Johns Hopkins HospitalCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Harrison v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Batchelor v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983
- Kovacs v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.