Legal Opinion
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. United States Department of Energy
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 25, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-190, 84-735PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
As a byproduct of the mandatory petroleum price controls instituted during the oil crisis of the early 1970s, the United States Department of Energy (“DOE”) has recovered over one billion dollars from various petroleum companies in settlement of claims of alleged violations of the federal price regulations. The task of disbursing those funds to the victims of the violations has fallen largely upon DOE’s Office of Hearings and Appeals (“OHA”) pursuant to its authority under 10 C.F.R. Part 205, Subpart V (1984) (“the Subpart V provisions” or “the Subpart V…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pasco, Inc. v. Federal Energy AdministrationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1975
- United States v. Exxon Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985
- Sauder v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1981
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Energy AdministrationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- International Drilling & Energy Corp. v. WatkinsTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1990
- Behm Family Corp. v. U.S. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1990
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. HerringtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
- Getty Oil Co. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.