Legal Opinion
State v. Provost
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 2, 1992No. C6-90-2479PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMONETT, Justice.
Defendant-appellant Provost was convicted of first degree murder following a bifurcated trial where he pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity. On appeal, defendant claims a Miranda violation, ineffective assistance of counsel, and error in prohibiting him from presenting expert psychiatric testimony during the first (or guilt) phase of the trial. We affirm.
Defendant Robert Provost, Jr., and Barbara Larson were married in August 1987, soon after they graduated from high school. During the fall of 1989, their relationship, never a happy one, worsened;…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. GreenleafSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. FranksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. GrieseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.