Legal Opinion

R.T.A., International, Inc. v. Cano

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided February 8, 1996No. 13-94-103-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RODRIGUEZ, Justice.

R.T.A. International, Inc. (“RTA”) appeals from a default judgment. RTA’s original answer, submitted by the company’s regis tered agent, was struck and the default judgment granted on the basis that Rule 7 of the Rules of Civil Procedure requires that an attorney answer for a corporation. We reverse and remand.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Eloy Cano was injured on the job while working for RTA, a California corporation registered to do business in Texas. Cano filed a Workman’s Compensation claim and was later fired. Claiming discrimination under Article 8307c of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. LippmannTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Davis v. JefferiesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Dell Development Corp. v. Best Industrial Uniform Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Globe Leasing, Inc. v. Engine Supply & MacHine ServiceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. Tyson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Custom-Crete, Inc. v. K-Bar Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  2. Menetti v. Chavers, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  3. Hock v. Salaices, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  4. In Re the Estate of Herring, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  5. KSNG Architects, Inc. v. Beasley, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API