R.T.A., International, Inc. v. Cano
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODRIGUEZ, Justice.
R.T.A. International, Inc. (“RTA”) appeals from a default judgment. RTA’s original answer, submitted by the company’s regis tered agent, was struck and the default judgment granted on the basis that Rule 7 of the Rules of Civil Procedure requires that an attorney answer for a corporation. We reverse and remand.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Eloy Cano was injured on the job while working for RTA, a California corporation registered to do business in Texas. Cano filed a Workman’s Compensation claim and was later fired. Claiming discrimination under Article 8307c of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. LippmannTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Davis v. JefferiesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Dell Development Corp. v. Best Industrial Uniform Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Globe Leasing, Inc. v. Engine Supply & MacHine ServiceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. Tyson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Custom-Crete, Inc. v. K-Bar Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
- Menetti v. Chavers, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- Hock v. Salaices, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- In Re the Estate of Herring, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- KSNG Architects, Inc. v. Beasley, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.