Hock v. Salaices

*592OPINION

PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

Appellant Robert Hock (“Hock”) appeals the granting of a summary judgment in a suit to partition real property. In four points of error, Hock complains that the trial court erred in granting the summary judgment and refusing to grant his motion for new trial because he did not have adequate notice of the hearing on the motion for summary judgment or an adequate opportunity to respond, and that appellee Gerlinde Sala-ices (“Salaices”) did not present sufficient evidence to entitle her to summary judgment. We reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Ho…