Stoneman v. Wick Construction Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
This case is before the court upon the findings of fact, which have not been challenged. Briefly, they show that the appellant intervener, Sterling of Aurora, Inc., leased certain property abutting Aurora avenue, in Seattle, from W. Glenn Stoneman, under an agreement whereby Stoneman would construct a retaining wall and fill. Stoneman submitted his proposed plan to the firm of Shannon & Wilson, engineers and soil experts, who advised him that soil conditions on the property in question might be unstable and inadequate and that soil tests would have to be made before any wall was designed for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eckerson v. Ford's Prairie School District No. 11Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- Freeman v. NavarreWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Ross v. Smith & BloxomWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Van Cello v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- Graham v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- SAFECO INSURANCE CO. OF AM. v. HirschmannWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Wojcik v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Ferrin v. DonnellefeldWashington Supreme Court · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.