Legal Opinion

Clements v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1939No. 8668PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

Appellant sued appellees in trespass to try title, and for damages, to certain described property situated in the City of Lampasas, Texas. The defendants pleaded not guilty,” and by cross-action Jesse Williams sought to have the deed held by Clements to said property cancelled, to have notes executed by him to Clements declared usurious, to have all payments made by him prior to two years before suit was filed credited on the principal debt, and to recover as penalty double the amount paid by him within such two-year period. Trial was to a jury on special issues and upon their…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ormsby v. RatcliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Sugg v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Palmetto Lumber Co. v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitney v. Alltel Communications, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Clements v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API