Legal Opinion
Gorum v. Oklahoma Liquefied Petroleum Gas Board
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 17, 1964No. Civ. No. 63-248PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
In this case the plaintiffs invoke the jurisdiction of a three-judge federal court under the provisions of Title 28 United States Code, § 2281 et seq., to obtain a decree that Title 52 Oklahoma Statutes Annotated, § 420.14 is unconstitutional and void by reason of said law denying them (1) the privileges and immunities as citizens of the several states, (2) the equal protection of the laws, and, (3) due process of law, all in violation of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, and said law as applied is (4) an unreasonable interference with interstate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Minnesota v. BlasiusSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Hanover Fire Insurance v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Traders Compress CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1973
- American Paving Co. v. Director of RevenueSuperior Court of Delaware · 1977
- Opinion No. 71-387 (1971) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1971
- Opinion No. 75-250 (1975) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1975