Legal Opinion

In Re Traders Compress Company

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided May 29, 1973No. BK-72-644PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BOHANON, District Judge.

The matter of permanent injunction came on for non-jury trial on April 30, 1973; the Trustee, H. M. Farrier, appearing by his attorney, Robert N. Naifeh; the Securities and Exchange Commission appearing by its attorney, Ronald Kane; and Texaco, Inc., appearing by its attorney, Elmer W. Adams. The briefs having been studied, all evidence introduced and arguments heard, the case was submitted to the Court for its decision, and the Court finds the following facts:

On April 28, 1972, the Debtor Corporation entered into a one-year supply contract with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re TriggCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  2. Trigg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. Sportfame of Ohio, Inc. v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co. (In Re Sportfame of Ohio, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API