Legal Opinion
Bolton v. Scrivner, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided November 9, 1993No. CIV-93-364-APublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALLEY, District Judge.
The matter before the Court is a Motion For Summary Judgment by defendant, Scrivner, Inc. (“Scrivner”), pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c). Since plaintiff, Floyd Bolton (“Bolton”), has filed a response to defendant’s motion, the matter is now ripe for decision. Based upon a review of the supporting and opposing briefs, their appendices and the relevant case law, the Court grants defendant’s motion.
STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS
Plaintiff Bolton, a 50-year-old man, had been employed by defendant Scrivner in the position of “order selector” at defendant’s grocery…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Armbruster v. Unisys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Floyd Bolton v. Scrivner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Charlie Milton v. Scrivner, Inc., Gary Massey v. Scrivner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Weigert v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Cheatwood v. Roanoke IndustriesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.