Legal Opinion
Miami Nation of Indians of Indiana v. Babbitt
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided October 11, 1996No. 3:92-cv-00586PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILLER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs (collectively the “Miamis”) have filed a motion to “complete and supplement the administrative record and to allow expert testimony,” and a request for oral argument on the motion. The defendants (collectively the “United States”) oppose the motion with respect to the administrative record and expert testimony, and have not addressed the request for oral arguments. Since the parties’ briefs sufficiently apprised the court of their respective positions, the court denies the request for oral argument. For the following reasons, the court…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Amfac Resorts, L.L.C. v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Tafas v. DudasDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- Blue Ocean Institute v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Center for Native Ecosystems v. SalazarDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
- Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.