Legal Opinion
Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics v. United States Forest Service
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided February 10, 2010No. 3:08-cv-00091PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS B. RUSSELL, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiffs, Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics (“FSEEE”) and Daphne Sewing’s, Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 23). The Defendant, United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) has filed a Motion for Cross Summary Judgment (Docket # 33). The Plaintiffs have filed a response (Docket # 36). The Defendant has filed a reply (Docket # 39). This matter is now ripe for adjudication. For the following reasons, the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. GerritsmaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Integrity Gymnastics & Pure Power Cheerleading, LLC v. United States Citizenship & Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- KENTUCKY RIVERKEEPER, INC. v. MidkiffDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
- Wehbi v. RiddleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021