Legal Opinion
The People of the Territory of Guam v. Pedro A.E. Manibusan, Juan P. Ignacio, Frank B. Bamba
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 6, 1984No. 83-1120 to 83-1122PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
Defendants appeal the decision of the Appellate Division of the Guam District Court reinstating an indictment dismissed by the Superior Court of Guam. Defendants argue that the indictment is insufficient in several respects and that the insufficiencies cannot be cured by amendment. We are unable to reach these issues, however, because the district court’s decision is not an appealable, final order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
Former Guam police officers were indicted for conspiracy and theft stemming from an alleged misuse of police…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Concepcion S. Wabol v. Victorino VillacrusisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Concepcion S. Wabol v. Victorino VillacrusisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Concepcion S. Wabol v. Victorino VillacrusisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Melvin Kiaaina and Lorelei Kiaaina, Husband and Wife and Nadine Nomura v. Alfred Jackson, and Chung Kuo Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- The People of the Territory of Guam v. Irvin IbanezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.