Legal Opinion

Doohan v. Nauman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1933No. 24323. Department OnePublished

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

In 1920, appellant purchased from respondent Nauman and wife, for $1,050, seven chains of tide lands in Padilla Bay in Skagit county, described as chains No. 272 to 278. About 1928, the land owners of Padilla Bay created a diking district to reclaim the lands for agricultural purposes. About July 1, 1930, the diking district was dissolved by proceedings in the superior court of that county, and certain money collected as damages from the construction company was distributed to the land owners. Appellant was apportioned $137.44 as his part of the damages. In July, 1930, at the request of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Farrell v. MentzerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Ackerson v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. In Re Weir's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. McSorley v. BullockWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Cushing v. HeustonWashington Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API