Legal Opinion
Doe v. City of Minneapolis
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 19, 1988No. Civ. 4-88-475PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSENBAUM, District Judge.
The city of Minneapolis, Minnesota, has enacted an ordinance requiring the removal of viewing booth doors in adult bookstores. Such viewing booths are utilized by patrons for observing movies, videos, or live dancing. Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the ordinance. They bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the City of Minneapolis. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 1331.
Plaintiffs commenced this action on June 3, 1988. Four days later, a hearing was held on plaintiffs’ request for a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Miller v. Civil City of South BendCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Ellwest Stereo Theater, Inc. v. BonerDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1989
- John Doe, Timothy Campbell, and Ferris J. Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Stanley Berg v. The Health And Hospital Corporation Of Marion County, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- O'Connor v. City and County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.