Nail v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for writ of mandate to the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Walter Bordwell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Application for a writ of mandate to compel the superior court, on an appeal from a justice’s court taken on questions of both law and fact, to review an order of the justice denying petitioner’s motion to dissolve a provisional attachment issued at the time the action was begun.
Waiving consideration of two matters which suggest themselves as having a probable bearing on the right of petitioner to the writ, but which are not presented on the application, we think the petition should be denied on the points and authorities presented. The first of the two matters referred to as not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Town of Santa Monica v. GuidingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Bullard v. McArdleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Maxson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Baughman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Murillo v. TooleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- McCarthy v. KurkjianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924