Wikle v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action for malicious prosecution. Before Judge Candler. DeKalb superior court. November 6, 1901.
1Opinion of the Court
Simmons, C. J.'
1. Where agency is shown hy proof of the relative situation of the parties, the agency is established no further than is necessary for the discharge of the duties ordinarily belonging to it. 2 Gr. Ev. §§ 64, 6ia.
■2. Accordingly, where a railroad company is sued for malicious prosecution, and it appears that one who had charge of the defendant’s business at a certain station and sold its tickets there missed certain money of the company from the cash-drawer, suspected a man who had been loitering about, and, going into another county, procured the arrest of the plaintiff because…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Daniel v. Excelsior Auto Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Warnock v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Collins & Toole v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Western Oil Refining Co. v. GlendenningIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927
- Newcomb Hotel Co. v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.