Legal Opinion

Diadone v. Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 5, 1930No. 7418PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaugh, J.

Appellant owned a comer lot in the city of Houston, fronting 50 feet on Dallas avenue and 100 feet on Velasco street. When he purchased it in July, 1921, Velasco street was traversed by the tracks of the International & Great Northern Ry. Company, laid on a dump in the middle of the street about 3 feet above the level of appellant’s lot. The building upon the premises was occupied and used by him and his family as a combined residence and store with his principal ingress and egress on Dallas avenue. In June, 1927, with the authority, consent, and approval of the city of Houston duly given,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. FullerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Fort Worth & New Orleans Railway Co. v. WallaceTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Boyer & Lucas v. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1903
  4. El Paso Electric Co. v. CollinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  5. Houston T. C. R. Co. v. StriblingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Solo Serve Co. v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Tarrant County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. HubbardTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Eric Salas v. Chris Christensen Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API