Legal Opinion

The Delaware Riverkeeper Network v. Sunoco Pipeline, L.P.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 2018No. 952 C.D. 2017PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY JUDGE SIMPSON

In this appeal, the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, Maya van Rossum, the Delaware Riverkeeper, and residential landowners Thomas Casey and Eric Grote (collectively, Plaintiffs) challenge orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester *674 County 1 (trial court) that dismissed their complaint and denied their petitions for injunctive relief. Through their complaint and requests for injunctive relief, Plaintiffs seek to prevent Sunoco Pipeline, L.P. (Sunoco) from constructing a new set of pipelines known as the Mariner East 2 pipeline (ME2) in West Goshen Township (Township)…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Murr v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Surrick v. ZHB OF U. PROVIDENCE TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Duquesne Light Co. v. Upper St. Clair TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. D. Lorenzen v. W. Cornwall Twp. ZHB & Sunoco Pipeline, L.P. ~ Appeal of: D. LorenzenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. D.N. Hommrich v. Com. of PA, PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Twp. of Marple v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. West Penn Power Co. v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API